| ▲ | panny 17 hours ago | |
>We, collectively, only have ourselves to blame, and now it's too late. No, "we" really don't. I wrote software. It's free. You're welcome to use it, or not. Nobody is forcing my software on you. You are not allowed to tell me that the software I wrote, for free, and gave to you, for free, needs to have features that I don't care about. You have an LLM now. I'm obsolete now, right? Do it. Build your nerfed distro, and make it popular. Oh, yeah... there isn't a single solitary disto built by an LLM, is there? Not even one. Wow. I wonder why... | ||
| ▲ | hananova 31 minutes ago | parent [-] | |
I’m not sure why you’re bringing up LLMs at all. I’m very anti-AI, so you’re barking up the wrong tree. Either way, your first paragraph is irrelevant. If your local law says that your software needs to obey some law, then it has to, and that’s that. You can whine all you want about privacy and freedom, but the law is the law. | ||