| ▲ | k310 18 hours ago | |||||||
I have to wonder A. If end users will mod their distros to send a "signal" (TBD?) to websites. B. If end users will just grab a pirate OS with apps compiled to not care about age. Hopefully the latest TAILS I downloaded is free of Big (over 18) Brother. And (A) Or just compile, Gentoo and LFS style. C. If pirates just take care of all this for friends and neighbors. D. When, not if, this unconstitutional coercion is challenged in court and cancelled via petition. Remember Proposition 8? | ||||||||
| ▲ | armadyl 18 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
I could see them eventually going far enough to bypass all of that and either requiring age verification at the point of the internet uplink on the ISP side or making it a crime similar to using a fake ID to buy alcohol if you try to bypass it. And then also punish companies that happen to be serving underage/non verified users. | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | gzread 11 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
Why do you have to mod your distro when you could simply go to the settings program and set "age bracket" to "18+"? | ||||||||
| ▲ | deno 15 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
Yes, it will be ineffective, so then they will point at all those examples, but will they decide the law is stupid? Of course not. The computers are not secure and they should only be able to run “verified” operating systems using attestation mechanisms. This was always where this was ultimately going. The idea has been fermenting since the DVD players had copy protections. It’s the planet destroying asteroid. We know the trajectory, we always knew it was coming for us. But once you can see with the naked eye it’s too late to do anything. | ||||||||