[flagged]

▲ ashdksnndck a day ago | parent | next [-]

It’s not that big of a coincidence that the countries that superpowers want to conquer, and need defending, are neighbors to the superpowers.

▲

godelski 21 hours ago | parent | next [-]

So much so that it's actually the expectation!

Country wants to expand its territory? Most likely place to extend to is those in its borders. It's literally the lowest hanging fruit.

Small country being invaded by large country? Who are they most likely to turn to? Does it seem that unlikely that they'd go to the biggest actor who doesn't like that country? The enemy of my enemy?

Coincidence? I think not! It's literally the most logical thing

▲

somenameforme 18 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

"Need" defending? I couldn't care less who rules Ukraine, Taiwan, Syria, Libya, Afghanistan, Iran, and these countless other places half-way around the world. It's not like China taking over Taiwan will have any impact on semiconductors. They're happy to play merchant to the world, independent of allegiance. E.g. - Ukraine complains about China supplying Russia with tech for their drones, while failing to recognize the countless "Made in China" stamps on their own hardware.

When despots act subservient to the US we're more than fine being BFF with them. See: Saudi Arabia. Heck we're even aiding them in their little 'special military operation' in Yemen. So funny how the rhetoric changes depending on who's involved: "On 26 March 2015, Saudi Arabia, leading a coalition of nine countries from West Asia and North Africa, staged a military intervention in Yemen at the request of Yemeni president Abdrabbuh Mansur Hadi, who had been ousted from the capital, Sanaa, in September 2014 by Houthi insurgents during the Yemeni civil war." [1]

So a president is overthrown by a popular insurrection, and then another country which was fond of the old government decides to take advantage of the situation to invade, primarily to further their own ends. This sounds oddly familiar, yet somehow the rhetoric around it is entirely different. Nah, I'm tired of this nonsense. If a country literally invades another country which we have a military alliance with then yeah - we have an obligation to intervene. But without that - I can think of far better ways to spend trillions of dollars than killing people half-way around the world.

[1] - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saudi-led_intervention_in_the_...

	▲	GJim 17 hours ago \| parent [-]
		> I couldn't care less who rules Ukraine, Taiwan, Syria, Libya, Afghanistan, Iran Oh you will. You most certainly will.

▲ krige 17 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

That's a really weird claim about Ukraine, which the US leadership would love to sweep under the rug, leave alone to be taken apart, except for the bad optics - so they just drag their feet forever.

▲ komali2 a day ago | parent | prev [-]

People keep making this strange claim about Taiwan, the only liberal democracy in the East without a single American soldier on its soil.

Almost like Taiwan is a sovereign nation uninterested in participating in the PRC and USA's fight for global hegemony.

▲ leptons 19 hours ago | parent | next [-]

The US would already be at war with China if the US tried to insert a military base in Taiwan.

▲ godelski 21 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

I think the funniest part is the fact that all the western countries are even afraid to recognize Taiwan's independence. It's a much better argument to say Korea or Japan are ruled by the US (and Korea and Japan absolutely hate one another!).

Does the US have influence in Taiwan? Certainly! But if that meant Taiwan was the US's puppet then Taiwan would simultaneously be China's puppet. Schrödinger's Vassal

▲ dotancohen 20 hours ago | parent | next [-]

  > afraid to recognize Taiwan's independence.

Does Taiwan claim independence?

I thought that both the government in Beijing and the government in Taipei both claim that all of China is united, and that they are the legitimate government of that united entity.

▲ YZF 20 hours ago | parent | next [-]

You're arguing semantics. The west refuses to recognize Taiwan as the legitimate government of China and refuses to recognize it as an independent country.

Whatever they claim, the west (and most of the world) due to Chinese leverage/power refuses to recognize.

Taiwan meets all the criteria for being a state. It controls land, population, it has a military, it has a government, currency, passports etc. etc. It's a de-facto country/state.

	▲	dotancohen 13 hours ago \| parent [-]
		It's not semantics if Taiwan itself does not claim independence.

▲ godelski 20 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

You literally described independence.

You're confusing land with governance.

▲ dotancohen 13 hours ago | parent [-]

I'm not. You'll notice that I used the terms correctly.

The government in Taipei claims all of mainland China and The island of Taiwan are united and a single state. As does the government in Beijing.

▲ godelski 8 hours ago | parent [-]

So you think North and South Korea are the same country? If not, which is the rightful country and which is the rebel? They both claim the same territory and that the other is illegitimate.

Do you think India and Pakistan are the same country? Or at least parts? There's a lot of disputed territories there.

Or do you believe Palestine is independent from Israel? They sure claim independence and Israel claims it's theirs.

Or what about the USA? The British sure thought it was theirs for a long time. Should France not have gotten involved in all of that?

▲ dotancohen 3 hours ago | parent [-]

  > So you think North and South Korea are the same country? If not, which is the rightful country and which is the rebel? They both claim the same territory and that the other is illegitimate.

I know not enough about the conflict to declare which side is more justified.

  > Do you think India and Pakistan are the same country? Or at least parts? There's a lot of disputed territories there.

Again, I know too little about the conflict.

  > Or do you believe Palestine is independent from Israel? They sure claim independence and Israel claims it's theirs.

The Arab citizens of the holy land did not declare a state when the former ruling party (the Brits) left, the Jews did declare a state. The Arabs even rejected the UN partition plan and decided that the fate of the area would be determined by war instead. Which they lost, and though they had some territory after the war they _still_ did not declare a state on that land. Only 15 years later did they form a government and an identity, and yet still did not declare a state. Only after the Israelis conquered the lands in yet another war, and then almost thirty years after that, did they declare a state with provisional borders. And they have rejected every final borders proposition made to them since. And during that entire time, they have been murdering civilians, both Jews and those who support peace with the Jews.

So yes, clearly in Area A the Palestinians have limited sovereignty - limited only because they consistently refuse all attempts to provide them more sovereignty.

  > Or what about the USA? The British sure thought it was theirs for a long time. Should France not have gotten involved in all of that?

Perhaps the French should not have gotten involved. I can imagine an alternate history where the British rule over the North American continent. The great result of the American Revolution wasn't the independent United States. The great result of the American Revolution was the implementation of a government based upon secular values and equality for all before the law. And even with the tools in place to implement that government, it still took almost two hundred years to enshrine those values into society.

And now, a mere two generations later, people have forgotten how hard the Americans worked to build that society and they are willing - active even - to discard it because of the few remaining minor deviations from perfection.

	▲	godelski 3 hours ago \| parent [-]
		`> I know not enough about the conflict to declare which side is more justified.` That was never the question at hand and I think illustrates why this discussion is pointless. You're unwilling to engage in a meaningful way, so bye.

▲ XorNot 20 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Taiwan buys military equipment and operates it's own military very much like it is independent of China and views Chinese troops in it's territory as a threat.

	▲	dotancohen 13 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Correct. However "in it's territory" includes inside mainland China.

▲ dismalaf 20 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

> afraid to recognize Taiwan's independence

No one is afraid. Taiwan themselves still claim to be the Republic of China and not separate from the rest of China.

▲ godelski 19 hours ago | parent [-]

  > No one is afraid.

You seem to have trouble reading. Here's a map that shows countries that recognize Taiwan's independence[0]. That's a lot of gray...

  > Taiwan themselves still claim to be the Republic of China and not separate from the rest of China.

You seem very confused... but I get it, it is confusing

Mainland China's current government is called the "People's Republic of China" (PRC)[1]

Taiwan calls itself the "Republic of China" (RoC)[2]

The difference of one word is very important. It's easy to miss, which is why Taiwan even changed its passport[3]... over a decade ago.

But also... they issue different passports. They have different governments. Really, this is not hard to understand that Taiwan considers themselves independent and the PRC considers the RoC a bunch of rebels. And... what do rebels typically do?

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_recognition_of_T...

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proclamation_of_the_People%27s...

[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taiwan

[3] http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/1758230.stm

▲

DiogenesKynikos 15 hours ago | parent [-]

The Taiwanese government still officially considers itself the government of all of China, not just of Taiwan and a few outlying islands.

▲

komali2 14 hours ago | parent [-]

This is false.

You will finally google this claim you've been repeating without evidence, and realize there's no supporting evidence for this claim. I guarantee it, because there is no evidence for this claim.

	▲	DiogenesKynikos 8 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		The Republic of China has not amended its constitution to eliminate its claim to all of China. You may be referring to the views of the current ruling party on what Taiwan should be, but constitutionally, it still claims everything.
	▲	godelski 7 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		Honestly it doesn't even matter if true or false, their logic is flawed. We could just swap China/Taiwan for the Koreas and it would still be dumb. Clearly they have independent governing bodies even though they both claim the other is an illegitimate ruling party. The patent is either trolling or delusional. Best to waste no more time