That's been my experience as well switching from Opus to Codex. Reasoning takes longer but answers are precise. Claude is sloppy in comparison.

▲

solenoid0937 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Weird, I have had the opposite experience. Codex is good at doing precisely what I tell it to do, Opus suggests well thought out plans even if it needs to push back to do it.

	▲	slopinthebag an hour ago \| parent [-]
		This is just the stochastic nature of LLM's at play. I think all of the SOTA models are roughly equivalent, but without enough samples people end up reading into it too much.

▲

throwaway911282 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

codex has been really good so far and the fast mode is cherry on top! and the very generous limits is another cherry on top

	▲	slopinthebag 43 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		It's well worth the $20 to not deal with any limits and have it handle all the boilerplate repetitive BS us programmers seem forced to deal with. I think 80% of the benefit comes from spending that $20 (20%? :P) and just having it do the lame shit that we probably shouldn't have to do but somehow need to.