There's also the possibility that we, as consumers, demand that the political system solves this issue with robust privacy legilsation that prohibits any entity from tracking our phones.

▲

pocksuppet 5 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Not all political systems respond to consumer demand.

▲

johnnyanmac 3 hours ago | parent [-]

Democratic ones do. But for 95% of causes it's hard to become so loud that they are forced to respond.

That's exactly why orgs like EFF exist. Most laws also aren't passed because of overwhelming consumer feedback. It's lobbied by special interests. Which sadly took a negative connotation over the last few decades, but lobbies can be for the people too.

▲

pocksuppet 2 hours ago | parent [-]

Studies show if 0% of the American population support a bill, it's 30% likely to be passed, and if 100% of the American population support it, it's 30% likely to be passed. Is America democratic?

	▲	kelnos an hour ago \| parent [-]
		I'm getting to the point where I believe representative democracy on the scale of hundreds of millions of people just doesn't work all that well. I've never been one of those "states' rights" people, but these days I am becoming convinced that the US should have a much smaller federal government, and states, counties, cities, and towns should have more autonomy in deciding their fates. This is not an easy problem to solve. Certainly I want more things at the federal level than the authors of the constitution envisioned (currency, international diplomacy, military, etc.): some things really need to be done at the national level (like environmental regulation). Anyway. Sure, those figures may be true for the US Congress (or not, I haven't verified), but I bet you those figures aren't even close to true for town and city councils and county government. And perhaps not even state government as well.

▲

philipallstar 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

We could also demand that the government doesn't use the location data from private companies without a warrant, but elections aren't often granular enough to satisfy individual requirements. Better to figure out a way to create and use a competitor that doesn't do this to you.

▲

pessimizer 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Why don't you "demand" a pony while you're at it?

▲

everdrive 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

>There's also the possibility that we, as consumers, demand that the political system solves this issue

This will never happen, but good luck.

	▲	GuinansEyebrows 3 hours ago \| parent [-]
		do you think that's any less likely than a mass boycott of all smartphone usage by the public?