| ▲ | hirvi74 2 hours ago | |
I've also had great results with using LLMs to pry into Apple's private and undocumented APIs. I've been impressed with the lack of hallucinations for C/C++ and Obj-C functions. I can attest that the quality in this domain has greatly improved over the years too. I am not always fan of the quality of the Swift code that my LLM produces, but I am impressed that what is often produced works in one shot, as well. The quality also is not that important to me because I can just refactor the logic myself, and often prefer to do it anyway. I cannot hold an LLM to any idiosyncrasies that I do not share with it. | ||
| ▲ | reactordev 23 minutes ago | parent [-] | |
Exactly. Even if it’s a skeleton, as long as it does “The Thing”, I’m happy. I can always refactor into something useful. | ||