| ▲ | dgxyz 5 hours ago | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
This. Actually fuck the whole dynamic web. Just give us hypertext again and build native apps. Edit: perhaps I shouldn't say this on an VC driven SaaS wankfest forum... | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | rainingmonkey 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
You may be interested in https://geminiprotocol.net/ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | dlivingston 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
I mean sure, but that's never going to happen, so complaining about it is just shaking your fist at the sky. The only way it will change is if the economics of the web change. Maybe that is the economics of developer time (it being easier/fast/more resilient and thus cheaper to do native dev), or maybe it is that dynamic scripting leads to such extreme vulnerabilities that ease of deployment/development/consumer usage change the macroeconomics of web deployment enough to shift the scales to local. But if there's one thing I've learned over the years as a technologist, it's this: the "best technology" is not often the "technology that wins". Engineering is not done in a vacuum. Indeed, my personal definition of engineering is that it is "constraint-based applied science". Yes, some of those constraints are "VC buxx" wanting to see a return on investment, but even the OSS world has its own set of constraints - often overlapping. Time, labor, existing infrastructure, domain knowledge. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | streetfighter64 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Imagine if wikipedia was a native app, what this vuln would have caused. I for one prefer using stuff in the browser where at least it's sandboxed. Also, there's nothing stopping you from disabling JS in your browser. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||