Presumably you don't consider a House panel to be under oath (since Lutnick, a part of this administration, will be appearing before one) ?

I will be happy to be wrong, assuming that happens.

I want everyone who associated with Epstein to be under oath at some point, and I think we should prioritize based on how many pieces of evidence their name appears on.

You think Trump will ever let himself be questioned under oath? Any rational person knows that his refusal is tantamount to an admission, but I bet he does not see it that way.