| ▲ | MattDamonSpace a day ago |
| The whole point is “$130B is chump change for the problems caused” and that’s true if companies as well |
|
| ▲ | functionmouse a day ago | parent [-] |
| Companies will make far more than 130b off this. There's no way they only raised prices just enough to cover the 130b and the labor required for the internal policy changes. This was a justification for price gouging. Which they will not stop doing. |
| |
| ▲ | hunterpayne 18 hours ago | parent [-] | | Agreed, this is the real take away most people will be left with. Not only did we all pay higher prices, instead of using that money to pay off the debt we give it away to business managers who were never out that money in the first place. Politically, that doesn't accomplish what some think it does. Midterms are coming up in 8 months...and the results of the house are going to be drastic no matter which side wins. Either Trump can do what he wants or the government will be deadlocked and nothing will happen for 2 years. Neither seem like good outcomes. | | |
| ▲ | lotsofpulp 16 hours ago | parent [-] | | > Either Trump can do what he wants or the government will be deadlocked and nothing will happen for 2 years. That isn’t drastic, that is already how it is. |
|
|