Glass is half empty, I see.

How about GSB stopped 16% of phishing sites? that's still huge.

Would you use anything that was only 16% effective for its claimed purpose?

“Tylenol stops headaches in 16% of people” - it’s huge, right? That’s millions of people we’re talking about.

Would you use it?

	▲	asadotzler 2 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		99% of users don't even know they're being protected. There's no promise except "we work to make browsing safer" and cutting even 5% of malicious sites from a user's experience is an unmitigated win for that user at the low false positive rate Safe Browsing offers.
	▲	NekkoDroid 5 hours ago \| parent \| prev \| next [-]
		If the other options would just straight up kill innocent bystanders (e.g. false positives for legit shops) I think that is a tradeoff I am willing to make.
	▲	HeatrayEnjoyer 5 hours ago \| parent \| prev \| next [-]
		Countless medications have <16% efficacy rate.
	▲	mock-possum 6 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		Idk why not? What’re the side effects?

debo_ 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

I guess the glass is 16% full.