> Just because it’s « boilerplate », that does not mean it’s worthless

Of course it is not. It is needed, by definition.

> or doesn’t carry novelty.

Of course it does not. Why would a piece of code that simply fills a large C structure with constants be innovative?

> Every project is different and not everything can be made from a generic out-of-shelf product

Tangential to use of LLMs for boring boilerplate stuff.