| ▲ | Retr0id 4 hours ago | |
> In traditional software law, a “clean room” rewrite requires two teams Is the "clean room" process meaningfully backed by legal precedent? | ||
| ▲ | karlding 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |
I am not a lawyer, but from my understanding the legal precedent is NEC v. Intel which established that clean-room software development is not infringing, even if it performs the same functionality as the original. As an aside, this clean room engineering is one of the plot points of Season 1 of the TV show Halt and Catch Fire where the fictional characters do this with the BIOS image they dumped. | ||
| ▲ | Firehawke 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
Sure. The reimplementation of the IBM PC BIOS that gave birth to IBM Compatibles is the canonical example. | ||
| ▲ | estimator7292 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
Yes. Compaq's reverse engineering of the IBM PC BIOS set the precedent. | ||
| ▲ | devmor 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |
It is the reason AMD exists. | ||