Remix.run Logo
ExoticPearTree 7 hours ago

And why would they have an objection to that? They sold a product to a customer. They should have no business in how that customer uses their software.

felipeerias 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

It’s a bit more complex than that, but to be fair I don’t know what they were expecting after they integrated a purpose-built model with Palantir to be deployed in high-security networks to carry out classified tasks.

mcmcmc 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

So firearms dealers should be fine with their customers going on mass murder sprees?

ExoticPearTree 4 hours ago | parent [-]

Is this a rethoric question?

kakacik 3 hours ago | parent [-]

Is your original question rhetoric? Because it ain't very... smart

warkdarrior 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Licensing is a thing. See requirements that, for example, GPL3 places on customers.

5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]
[deleted]
sixothree 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

I'd hate to break it to you, but companies do have a right to determine how their products are used. You were subject to that when you wrote that comment. Did you not notice that?

ExoticPearTree 4 hours ago | parent [-]

No, I do not think they do. If a buy a car a run somebody over on purpose, the manufacturer has no right to come take my car away. Even if it were to be written in a contract.