| ▲ | Imustaskforhelp 3 hours ago | |||||||||||||
Doesn't google have the capability to have multiple warnings and yet still ignores them? | ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | TheOtherHobbes 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||||||||
Google has legal personhood, but as a corporation its ethical responsibilities are much looser than those of an individual, and it's extremely hard to win a criminal case against a corporation even when its agents and representatives act in ways that would be criminal if they happened in a non-corporate context. The law - in practice - is heavily weighted towards giving corporations a pass for criminal behaviour. If the behaviour is really egregious and lobbying is light really bad cases may lead to changes in regulation. But generally the worst that happens is a corporation can be sued for harm in a civil suit and penalties are purely financial. You see this over and over in finance. Banks are regularly pulled up for fraud, insider dealing, money laundering, and so on. Individuals - mostly low/mid ranking - sometimes go to jail. But banks as a whole are hardly ever shut down, and the worst offenders almost never make any serious effort to clean up their culture. | ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | autoexec 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||||||||
ChatGPT thinks that they can identify when someone may not be mentally well. There's no reason to think that Google can't. In fact, I'm pretty sure Google has a list of the mental health issues of just about every person with a Google account in that user's dossier. | ||||||||||||||