> This guy was 36 years old. He wasn't a kid.

For god's sake I am a kid (17) and I have seen adults who can be emotionally unstable more than a kid. This argument isn't as bulletproof as you think it might be. I'd say there are some politicians who may be acting in ways which even I or any 17 year old wouldn't say but oh well this isn't about politics.

You guys surely would know better than me that life can have its ups and downs and there can be TRULY some downs that make you question everything. If at those downs you see a tool promoting essentially suicide in one form or another, then that shouldn't be dismissed.

Literally the comment above yours from @manoDev:

I know the first reaction reading this will be "whatever, the person was already mentally ill".

But please take a step back and check what % of the population can be considered mentally fit, and the potential damage amplification this new technology can have in more subtle, dangerous and undetectable ways.

The absolute irony of the situation that the next main comment below that insight was doing exactly that. Please take a deeper reflection, that's all what people are asking and please don't dismiss this by saying he wasn't a kid.

Would you be all ears now that a kid is saying to you this now? And also I wish to point out that kids are losing their lives too from this. BOTH are losing their lives.

It's a matter of everybody.