| ▲ | petcat 5 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||
This US administration (or any admin) would almost certainly impose export controls on US AI technology before it would allow one of the frontier model providers to be acquired/relocate outside the US. It did the same thing when ASML wanted to acquire Cymer (California company that provides the EUV light source technology). The acquisition was only allowed under strict technology sharing/export agreements with the Dutch government. Europe really just needs to rally behind Mistral. That's where they should dump their cash. | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | fc417fc802 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
Can they actually prevent it though? In typical cases there would be IP licenses involved. But in this case it's a valuation based (AFAICT) on a team of people plus their infra. What happens if they all just happened to get hired by "AnthropicEU GmbH" a new entity which has been gifted hundreds of millions in computing resources? | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | ivan_gammel 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||
Having one „champion“ is flawed European approach. We need local competition and headhunting to make it fly. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||