| ▲ | jdjdndnzn 12 hours ago |
| Just want to point out this comment is highly ironic. This is all a computer does :P We need llms to be able to tap that not add the same functionality a layer above and MUCH less efficiently. |
|
| ▲ | Nuzzerino 12 hours ago | parent [-] |
| > We need llms to be able to tap that not add the same functionality a layer above and MUCH less efficiently. Agents, tool-integrated reasoning, even chain of thought (limited, for some math) can address this. |
| |
| ▲ | RagnarD 10 hours ago | parent [-] | | You're both completely missing the point. It's important that an LLM be able to perform exact arithmetic reliably without a tool call. Of course the underlying hardware does so extremely rapidly, that's not the point. | | |
| ▲ | kruffalon 6 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Could you explain why that is? | | |
| ▲ | koolala 6 hours ago | parent [-] | | A tool call is like 100,000,000x slower isnt it? | | |
| ▲ | kruffalon 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | No idea really, but if it is speed related I would have thought that OP would have used faster rather than importance to try and make their point. | | |
| ▲ | koolala 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | It's both. Being dirrctly a part of it makes it integrated into its intelligence for training and operation. |
|
|
| |
| ▲ | jdjdndnzn 8 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | The computer ALREADY does do math reliably. You are missing the point. |
|
|
