Can we stop it with "and the results are terrifying", "and you won't believe what I found", "the <x> situation is insane", etc.? The over-hyping of low quality, low effort content is making it hard to find actually interesting or informative things.

▲

SunshineTheCat 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Yea I was thinking the same thing.

When you reach for the most exaggerated, over-the-top word possible when describing something relatively mundane, what will you use when you talk about something that actually is "terrifying?"

	▲	thfuran 4 hours ago \| parent [-]
		“The most terrifying thing you’ve ever heard”. You can even stick with that one as long as your subjects are monotonically scary.

▲

cheschire 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Find a better and more accessible solution than clickbait.

Please, do it.

▲

arcfour 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

"Privacy concerns found in audit of popular dev tools" (or something along those lines) would work without feeling sensationalized.

	▲	cheschire 2 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Yes this one time. I’m speaking generally in response to the general plea.

▲

bmenrigh 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

"better", "more accessible"? What the hell are you talking about? Clickbait doesn't make anything better or more accessible.

Instead, it makes it impossible to pre-select for interesting information. Instead of telling you what something is about, it tells you how you should feel about it. That's not improving accessibility.

▲

cheschire 2 hours ago | parent [-]

I meant from the author’s perspective. Clickbait is too easy, which is probably why it’s so popular.

	▲	bmenrigh 2 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Oh completely. But my perspective is that we all should individually punish clickbait by not clicking. More broadly, we should strive to keep HN full of quality tech content rather than clickbait.