| ▲ | jpgreenall 3 hours ago |
| Sure. But do we think the topic was chosen at random? |
|
| ▲ | BeetleB 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| When primed, people will see things that aren't there. |
| |
| ▲ | sumeno an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | and it's someone's job to think of that connection before publishing the release and they failed | |
| ▲ | Imustaskforhelp 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | but sometimes, people do see things behind the curtain. The timing of talking about this topic does feel pretty strange I'd say as well as the GP comment noted? | | |
| ▲ | BeetleB 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | My point is: You're never going to know if this is a coincidence or not. And even if it was intentional, it's of little consequence. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | jonas21 an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| No, it wasn't chosen at random -- it had to be a question that any reasonable person would immediately recognize as harmless, but where the old model would inject a bunch of safety caveats and the new model would not. |
| |
| ▲ | messe an hour ago | parent [-] | | > that any reasonable person In short supply on that side of the Atlantic these days it seems. |
|
|
| ▲ | jstummbillig an hour ago | parent | prev [-] |
| No, and it's also not a conspiracy. |
