| ▲ | jmward01 4 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cloud = the right choice when just starting. It isn't about infra cost, it is about mental cost. Setting up infra is just another thing that hurts velocity. By the time you are serving a real load for the first time though you need to have the discussion about a longer term strategy and these points are valid as part of that discussion. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | andoando 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
I guess it depends, but infra is also a lot simpler when starting out. It really isnt much harder (easier even?) to setup services on a box or two than managing AWS. Im pretty sure a box like this could run our whole startup, hosting PG, k8s, our backend apis, etc, would be way easier to setup, and not cost 2 devops and $40,000 a month to do it. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | CyberDildonics 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Is infra really that hard to set up? It seems like infra is something a infra expert could establish to get the infra going and then your infra would be set up and you would always have infra. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||