> But hey 1% of people died, as predicted if we did nothing at all

Nope. Compare the death rates of Sweden vs its neighbours in the Nordics (the closest comparisons we have with similar weather/culture/etc.). Or if you don't care about minimising variables, in the US between states that did lockdowns and mask mandates and those that didn't. In every comparable (e.g. excluding rural vs urban) case, there were more deaths in "doing nothing" than implementing the same basic public health axioms that have held true for centuries.

> Inflation

That was also helped by Russia invading Ukraine, which increased global prices of multiple important raw materials. But yes, inflation after a period of deflation/economic contraction/restricted travel and consumption was to be expected.

> People in school got a terrible education and it affected my workforce

It's definitely a bigger issue for them than it is for you. And yeah, it sucks for them. Would have been pretty terrible to tell teachers (who overwhelmingly skew older) they should risk their lives just to keep kids occupied too.

> It only reinforces the importance of competition over protectionism.

What has that got to do with COVID?

▲

izendejas 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

The thing too many forget is that if we didn't flatten the curve our entire medical system was going to collapse. It's insane that people don't yet understand this concept and can't even empathize with medical professionals. Yes, we all struggled, but try talking to medical professionals to see how they did.

When something doesn't happen because enough measures were taken, then it wasn't worth it because it didn't happen?

	▲	sofixa 2 hours ago \| parent [-]
		> The thing too many forget is that if we didn't flatten the curve our entire medical system was going to collapse Yep, if things were going well there wouldn't have been makeshift morgues with refrigerated trucks, sick people having to be moved around to different countries, the military deploying field hospitals, corpses piling in the streets. Those examples are from a variety of countries, which shows how bad the situation was globally.

▲

lostlogin 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> Compare the death rates of Sweden

As a New Zealander, I like to chuck out our achievement of a negative death rate. Covid lockdowns resulted in less New Zealanders dying than usual.

But, like elsewhere, economic and social harm were both high.

	▲	ninalanyon 3 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		> negative death rate. Norway had that too; without lockdown. Curfews would require a change in the constitution and the last time they happened was during WWII which makes them doubly unpopular.
	▲	pocksuppet 4 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		You had 6 weeks of staying at home, and then quarantines for international travellers after that. In return, you had no COVID-19 at all for several years. Seems a fair trade.

▲

braincat31415 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Sweden all-cause mortality was indeed higher if an immediate pre-pandemic year is taken as a base. However, pre-pandemic years in Sweden show a substantial dip in all-cause mortality, something that neighboring countries did not see. It is not that simple.

▲

dhosek 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

I mean sure more people died than were necessary, but think of the shareholder value that was created!