| ▲ | OKRainbowKid 8 hours ago |
| How so? The law doesn't require cookie banners.
However, you could argue that tracking/advertisement cookies should have been banned completely and that the law is flawed in that it allows for tracking given user "consent". |
|
| ▲ | raw_anon_1111 7 hours ago | parent [-] |
| I love the EU apologists - “it wasn’t a bad law just because the outcome was bad” |
| |
| ▲ | GJim 7 hours ago | parent [-] | | The alternative being to bend over and grab our ankles with both hands the moment the scummy ad-tech industry requests our data? Sorry mate, the GDPR is there for a bloody good reason; and legit companies obey the law. | | |
| ▲ | drnick1 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | The GDPR is theater. An effective privacy law would have prevented data collection in the first place. Data collected will be abused, and a cute little banner won't change this. | |
| ▲ | raw_anon_1111 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Yes because of the GDPR, there aren’t still two trillion dollar+ market cap ad Tech companies. But at least we have cookie banners everywhere. | | |
| ▲ | GJim 7 hours ago | parent [-] | | More pity to those who (for some bizarre reason) voluntarily choose to interact with those ad-tech companies. | | |
|
|
|
