| ▲ | AdamN 10 hours ago | |
The pixel density is the same I believe - I guess their theory is that 5K is more fungible than a large 6K display since people looking for more real estate can daisy chain the 5K displays. | ||
| ▲ | atonse an hour ago | parent [-] | |
I have two 27" 5k displays (both more than 5 years old, so they're not HDR or 120Hz). I know I'm privileged but my biggest issue with them isn't the HDR or 120Hz. It's that the seam between them causes me to not be able to use that "middle" real estate. So I was side-eyeing a 6k display cuz it would have most of the benefits of a dual 4k but more real estate and more flexibility in windowing. The curved displays also look quite promising (like the Neo G2), but not feeling like spending money when I have two perfectly good monitors that already work. | ||