| ▲ | aurareturn 9 hours ago | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Whoah, both the Pro and Max CPUs feature 18 cores. This hasn't happened since M1 Pro/Max. This is a surprise. Also, the mix of cores have changed drastically. - 6 "Super cores" - 12 "Performance cores" I'm guessing these are just renamed performance and efficiency cores from previous generations. This is a massive change from the M4 Max: - 12 performance cores - 4 efficiency cores This seems like a downgrade (in core config but may not be in actual MT) assuming super = performance and performance = efficiency cores. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | klausa 8 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
I don't think the "new" Performance cores are just "renamed" "E" / "Efficiency" cores; Apple has retroactively renamed the baseline M5 nomenclature to say it has "10-core CPU with 4 super cores and 6 efficiency cores"; so they're clearly keeping the "efficiency cores" nomenclature around. I think this is a new design, with Apple having three tiers of cores now, similar to what Qualcomm has been doing for a while. I think how it breaks down is: - "Super" are the old "P" cores, and the top tier cores now - "Performance" cores are a new tier and seen for the first time here, slotting between "old" P and E in performance - "Efficiency" / "E" are still going to be around; but maybe not in desktop/Pro/Max anymore. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | Havoc 40 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Intel is totally gonna steal that. They're catching so much flak for their "efficiency cores" I'm surprised they haven't done a rebrand yet | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | aurareturn 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Replying to my own post. In hindsight, this shouldn't be any surprise because these chips are now chiplets. Apple is connecting a CPU die with a GPU die. This means they're designing just one CPU die rather than two. An Ultra would just be two of these CPU dies. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | netruk44 9 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
I think super cores are a new type/tier of core, not a rename of performance. The base M5 has super/efficiency cores. The Pro and Max have super/performance cores. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | jacobp100 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
I was looking into this. The M5 performance cores can be scaled down to match efficiency cores in performance and power usage. I believe they lower the clock speed, limit how much work is done in parallel on each core, and limit how aggressive the speculative execution is so less work is wasted. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | 9 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| [deleted] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | cced 9 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
So they renamed performance to mean efficiency and are now using super in place of performance? | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||