> senior AI reporter

A true "senior" AI reporter should be more skeptical of LLM output than anyone else.

I think that's the nail in the coffin. Most others could say it was a giant whoopsie, but here it goes to the heart of their credibility. How could they continue write authoritatively about AI, having done this.

I dunno. If AI doesn't write your articles, are you even an AI reporter?

Sorry, I never could resist a good dad joke