| ▲ | evolve2k 5 hours ago |
| Counter-point; we are in times of mass upheaval and protest. Purchasing a secure phone is desirable to almost anyone who is increasingly worried about state and corporate actors, especially those that would seek to surveil and coerce. I suspect some will buy these phones as a daily driver, some as a second phone. Institutional trust is at an all time low, this is a smart move selling into the growing demand for secure devices and it’s in line with Lenovos recent big decision to sell Linux as the default on their new devices. Finally this seems to be a corporate play itself, most companies also don’t want other companies surveilling their staff and extracting staff secrets. Hence the bringing of enterprise functionality to compliment the ‘secure’ work Graphene are already doing. |
|
| ▲ | Arainach 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| Consumers, when faced with a $100 Microwave that will last 2 years and a $130 microwave that will last ten, will buy the cheaper one nearly always. They don't care. Consumers, when faced with a phone that offers "privacy" but that doesn't work with their banking app or their favorite game, will return it and get the non-privacy phone essentially every time. |
|
| ▲ | thewebguyd 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| > Lenovos recent big decision to sell Linux as the default on their new devices. Where did you see this? I want to believe it, but I can't find any press release about this (other than it already being available as an option at checkout, but it's not default) outside of weird domains full of AI articles. |
| |
| ▲ | evolve2k 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | Ok this has taken me down a rabbit hole. I swear I read this from a reputable source a week or so ago and my memory was that I went to post it here and there was already a HN post (but have been unable to find that nor the original article). Basic details from the article were that machines would come with Ubuntu for retail and fedora for business machines and that 60% of new machines were planned to be Linux; therefore ending Lenovos prioritising windows on the majority of its machines. But yeah can’t find much record of it now. This site seems to have scraped the article I read as that copy all reads familiar but I def wasn’t reading from an AI site with a YouTube thumbnail up top. https://galaxy.ai/youtube-summarizer/lenovos-historic-shift-... Earlier article that’s not in question.
https://itsfoss.com/news/lenovo-cuts-windows-tax/ |
|
|
| ▲ | jama211 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| There’s a huge amount of wishful thinking in this that people will care, and the Lenovo thing is just false. |
| |
| ▲ | goku12 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | I'm going to say this again. You aren't giving people credit where it's due. Those who live in democracies don't hold that privilege by not caring about anything. It's something that they constantly fight for. The only specialty that we possess over others is a deeper knowledge about technology and the politics behind it. But it DOESN'T have to be exclusive to us. We're not the only ones fed up with this amount of BS from the gilded class. People do listen and act if we're willing to inform them. Even if everyone doesn't respond, there will still be enough to make a difference. Just dismissing their will like this is uncharitable at best. | |
| ▲ | spaceribs 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | People won't care until they do. After two years of talking up mastodon/pixelfed and most folks ignoring me, I've gotten 2 pings from family members about signing up and migrating off of twitter/instagram. It's only a matter of time and how quickly the rug gets pulled out from under folks I think. | | |
|
