| ▲ | staticautomatic 4 hours ago | |
Not peremptory strikes, but you have unlimited removals for cause (and admittedly a steep appellate hill to climb if they’re unfairly denied) | ||
| ▲ | cucumber3732842 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |
You're gonna have a hell of a time construing a quality (energy sector or few steps removed employment) as "cause" when it's applicable to a large minority if not majority of the jury pool. The judge might allow it, but the odds are long and the next judge will certainly allow an appeal on those grounds so you probably don't even gain much except time. | ||
| ▲ | ohyoutravel 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |
Voting for Trump is not “removal for cause.” Though maybe one could use that as an indicator of bias/stunted brain development that would be cause, I’m not sure, I’m not a lawyer. | ||