This article was clearly written by a human (and AI) but still has a few "LLMisms" such as:

- The key insight - [CoreML] doesn't XXX. It YYY.

With that being said, this is a highly informative article that I enjoyed thoroughly! :)

The article links to their own Github repo: https://github.com/maderix/ANE

walthamstow 5 hours ago | parent | next [-]

We've got about a year before so many people are interacting with LLMs on a daily basis that its style starts to reverse infect human speech and writing

▲

baxtr 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Great insight – Would you like to try and identify some specific "AI-isms" that you've noticed creeping into your own writing or your colleagues' emails lately?

▲

pixl97 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

This said, there were people that talked like this before LLMs, it didn't develop this whole cloth.

▲

pcrh an hour ago | parent | next [-]

The article above doesn't read well, at all.

It's not my subject, but it reads as a list of things. There's little exposition.

▲

DrScientist 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Exactly. LLM's are mimics.

People seem to be going around pointing out that people talk like parrots, when in reality it's parrots talk like people.

	▲	pixl97 3 hours ago \| parent [-]
		I mean, it's both. Did you develop your own whole language at any point to describe the entire world? No, you, me, and society mimic what is around us. Humans have the advantage, at least at this point, of being a continuous learning device so we adapt and change with the language use around us.

▲

Angostura 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

My honest take? You're probably right

	▲	sholladay 3 hours ago \| parent [-]
		You are absolutely right. Here is why you are correct: - I see what you did there. - You are always right.

▲

rafram 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Also the Prior Art section, which has telltale repetition of useless verbs like "documenting," "providing insight into," and "confirming" on each line. This was definitely AI-written, at least in part.