| ▲ | cubefox 6 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||
Maybe 100 years after birth instead. | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | cestith 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
That’s a disincentive to authors in their later years if it’s a straight rule. We’d need something like a minimum of 20 years or up to their 100th birthday or something. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | notarobot123 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||
This isn't a bad idea. It would prevent the constant recycling of copyrighted works and bias the creative economy towards newer works. It seems the bias is in the other direction at the moment. | |||||||||||||||||