| ▲ | titanomachy 9 hours ago | |
It's not about "looking racist"; or at least, it's not about public opinion. A racially targeted measure would violate specific laws and would be challenged in court, likely successfully. | ||
| ▲ | rolandog 9 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |
It could also be a signal that they intend to take on the world; so they could technically not be racist if "everyone else is a threat". | ||
| ▲ | sigwinch 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
The Kavanaugh rule specifically permits it. If you’re taking odds that this Supreme Court will challenge the Kavanaugh rule, I’ll wager 1:1 against. | ||
| ▲ | pixl97 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
That was so years ago, this is the point we're at now. SCOTUS: Nothing Trump does is illegal. Trump: "does illegal things" Courts: You can't do this, it is illegal. Trump: "ignores courts" Courts: "shocked pikachu face" | ||
| ▲ | watwut 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |
Not sure if you noticed, lower courts ruled against administration many times ... they were ignored. And as a bonus upreme court practically ruled president can be lawless as he pleases. | ||