| ▲ | madduci 13 hours ago |
| I really hope that the partnership involves support for low-end devices and not only high-end ones. Would be great to have a €200 Phone running GrapheneOS (e.g. G56) |
|
| ▲ | nie100sowny 12 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| I guess it's rathet hard to satisfy GrapheneOS requirements in 200 bucks budget. Things like at least 5 years of updates. |
| |
| ▲ | Aachen 8 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | That's already required if you want to sell the device in the EU (or EEA?) at all. So far, Motorola hasn't left the market with their low-end devices so I presume they intend to deliver on the updates | |
| ▲ | microtonal 10 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Also requires a pretty new/high-end CPU for MTE and a separate secure enclave. | | |
| ▲ | strcat 9 hours ago | parent [-] | | The secure element can be on the same CPU die as Apple does with the SEP but a device with only TrustZone wouldn't meet the requirements. It also needs to be a high quality implementation providing the expected features. | | |
| |
| ▲ | madduci 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Why? Some cheap smartphones are really powerful enough, the Software is bloated enough to feel sluggish |
|
|
| ▲ | nebalee 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Yes, please. It's a shame that privacy as a feature so often comes with a hefty price tag. |
| |
| ▲ | madduci 6 hours ago | parent [-] | | Perhaps €200 is too low as price, but I don't get why generally only flagships (900+) are considered the only citizens to get that support. I remember the time only OnePlus flagship phones got the best LineageOS support back then, while older, cheaper ones hadn't |
|
