| ▲ | HarHarVeryFunny 4 hours ago | |||||||
I use Gemini all the time, but I have to say it's got verbal diarrhea and an EXTREMELY annoying trait of wanting to lead the conversation rather than just responding to what YOU want to do. At the end of every response Gemini will always suggest a "next step", in effect trying to 2nd guess where you want the conversation to go. I'd much rather have an AI that just did what it was asked, and let me decide what to ask next (often nothing - maybe it was just a standalone question!). Apparently this annoying "next step" behavior is driven by the system prompt, since the other day I was running Gemini 3 Thinking, and it was displaying it's thoughts which included a reminder to itself to check that it was maintaining a consistent persona, and to make sure that it had suggested a next step. I'd love to know the thought process of whoever at Google thought that this would make for a natural or useful conversation flow! Could you imagine trying to have a conversation with a human who insisted on doing this?! | ||||||||
| ▲ | edoceo 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
Yes. That is a salesperson. The next-step is to drive engagement. I know you're not interested in $THiNG now but can I follow up in 3 months? In persona I think the AIs are that Claude is the engineer and Gemini is the sales-person and GPT is the eager and loud journeyman. | ||||||||
| ▲ | vrosas 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
I don’t know, I’ve found the follow ups nice sometimes. You can just ignore them if they’re not useful. The computer won’t get mad… | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | debo_ 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
Yes. Gemini is mimicking its creators: this is exactly how I experienced speaking to most Googlers. | ||||||||