| ▲ | pdimitar 7 hours ago |
| Recently tried multiple terminals because I am gradually migrating off of Macs and I liked Ghostty but the lack of searching the scrollback has turned me away from it. Opening another editor to do the same I tried but didn't like. WezTerm has everything I need and is closest to iTerm2, minus being able to quit it and have it restore all windows and tabs on restart -- but oh well, it's not an important enough feature. It also renders my prompt perfectly; no small pixel divergences like all other terminals have. Kitty I don't remember why I rejected. Alacritty I like but the lack of tabs is not acceptable for the moment... and before you ask: I hate tmux. So much more key presses to achieve basic functionality, it boggles my mind why people love it. But, to each their own obviously. It's also likely I'll settle for some Linux-exclusive terminal but as I'm not yet possessing a Linux workstation (just a laptop) I haven't put the requisite time to do this research. Suggestions are welcome. |
|
| ▲ | jcgl 7 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| > Kitty I don't remember why I rejected. Maybe worth another look at then? I'm far from a Kitty power user, but it does pretty much everything else I want it to, including working as a quake-style terminal[0]. And you can extend it with kittens[1] if you so desire. Also, the next release should presumably include smooth scrolling[2] which I'm quite looking forward to. Maybe more than any one feature though, I appreciate the hard work that Kovid (the creator of Kitty) has done to tastefully add new VT standards and try to make terminals as useful as they can be in the 21st century. [0] https://sw.kovidgoyal.net/kitty/kittens/quick-access-termina... [1] https://sw.kovidgoyal.net/kitty/kittens_intro/ [2] https://github.com/kovidgoyal/kitty/pull/9330 |
| |
| ▲ | homebrewer 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Kitty is the best one. It has several features which have proven so useful I wasn't able to stay on anything else for more than a couple of hours (including the one this topic is about). Ctrl+Shift+G wraps the output of the previous command into a pager (say, less). You often only know you needed a pager after that output is printed. Ctrl+Shift+E highlights all links on the current screen and assigns short alphanumeric codes to them, so you can open links without using the mouse. For example, `Ctrl+Shift+E 1` opens the first link, `.. 2` the second one, etc. Ctrl+Shift+U opens symbol search where you can find & insert symbols using their unicode names. Emoji, TUI blocks, rare accented characters you need once in a blue moon, CJK ideographs, whatever. | |
| ▲ | idoubtit 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I'm not the GP, but I do remember why I rejected Kitty when I tried several terminal emulators last years: it broke quite a few of my workflows. For instance, in vim the F3 key was broken[^1]. It was very surprising and weird, and a portable workaround required some arcane vim configuration. Another important pain point was that the font rendering was different in Kitty to any other app, and very dependent on the screen DPI. IIRC, for a DPI around 100, I had to switch to "legacy rendering" because the default rendering was barely readable. I also remember issues with SSH. And Kitty crashed at least once. And I wasn't a fan of Kitty's mix of C and Python. After a week or two of usage, my Kitty config file was big, with an extra hundred lines of Python for the tabbar. Despite some nice features (like the shortcut to put the output of the last command into a file), I got uneasy with all this mess. I tried Ghostty, which was as good as Kitty with much less oddities. [^1]: https://github.com/vim/vim/issues/13328 | |
| ▲ | nine_k 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Kitty is great, but its author has very strong opinions, strongly held; this keeps a number of popular requests summarily rejected. In particular, there is no way to color plain bold text, which is possible in basically any other emulator. This is a deal-breaker for me personally, it makes reading e.g. man pages unnecessarily hard. WezTerm is a very good replacement. | | |
| ▲ | mbrumlow an hour ago | parent [-] | | > author has very strong opinions. So true. To the point I have to maintain my own fork to make the command key my meta |
| |
| ▲ | tcoff91 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Kitty is the GOAT terminal |
|
|
| ▲ | pkulak 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Foot is worth a look. It’s the only terminal I’ve ever seen that starts up in sub-50ms cold, without a service already running. But you do have to run a proper window manager so you don’t have to require tab support in every single app. ;) |
|
| ▲ | Crisco 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I wouldn't say I love tmux, but I have a configuration file that I put on every computer I use regularly that is very comfortable for me. I basically live in the terminal across many different machines, and having the same interface for managing panes and tabs even when using ssh is invaluable. I also use vim (well neovim) as my primary editor, and have set up tmux to integrate well with it, so that might contribute to my appreciation and continued usage of it. |
| |
| ▲ | nickjj 6 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Yep, I've been using tmux for almost 10 years. Its config has followed me across every terminal I've used in Windows with WSL 2, macOS (work laptop) and native Linux. It's a nice abstraction over getting split panes, windows (tabs), sessions, search, scroll back, consistent key binds and the overall theme to work the same across environments. | |
| ▲ | homebrewer 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | If you spend any amount of time on remote machines with unreliable connections, local tmux is insta-reject because tmux inside tmux is very inconvenient. As with GP, it's also why I don't consider terminal emulators without tabs at all. | | |
| ▲ | yjftsjthsd-h 5 hours ago | parent [-] | | > because tmux inside tmux is very inconvenient. Hitting c-b c-b isn't that inconvenient? | | |
| ▲ | NateEag 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Agreed. I hold Control and double-tap b for managing the remote session, then everything else is the same. Granted, I'm not a power user, so there may be numbers that get frustrating. I could imagine complex splits getting confusing (I don't use splits at all). | |
| ▲ | nine_k 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | C-b is less ergonomic than C-a that is the default on GNU screen. The first thing in tmux is to remap to C-a. (Triply so if you remap caps lock to ctrl.) |
|
| |
| ▲ | binsquare 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Yep same, I install ohmytmux and I'm ready to go. |
|
|
| ▲ | CoderJoshDK 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Scrollback does exist on Ghostty! But you need to switch to “tip”. This can be done in the config file.
The tip build is very stable and has many bugs fixed (like various memory leaks). |
| |
| ▲ | weinzierl 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Tip is good but depending on your platform you might need to build it yourself and then you need a particular zig version. | |
| ▲ | PolCPP 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Does it work all the time? I'm using tip and had scrollback stop working after a long ssh session. |
|
|
| ▲ | loeg 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I haven't seen anyone else mention Terminology yet. It uses an unconventional GUI framework (Enlightenment / EFL), but that aside, it's fast and has more or less all of the features you'd expect of a terminal: https://github.com/borisfaure/terminology Its "moment" as a new novel terminal was over a decade ago, but it still chugs on working just fine. Notably(?), gregkh uses it (or used to use it): https://www.linuxfoundation.org/blog/blog/greg-kroah-hartman... |
| |
| ▲ | cess11 5 hours ago | parent [-] | | Back in 2018 I thought it felt kind of sluggish and consumed quite a bit of resources, but looked pretty. Have they improved on performance since then? | | |
| ▲ | loeg an hour ago | parent [-] | | Are you sure you're thinking of the same terminal? Its standout feature has been performance. Granted, that was 10+ years ago, but I've never noticed it regressing. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | macmccann 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| there's scrollback search in the nightly build if that's an option for you (I've been using it a ton for a few months and haven't seen any bugs so far): https://github.com/ghostty-org/ghostty/releases/tag/tip |
|
| ▲ | everforward 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I like tmux because it does more than tabs in an emulator. I can detach from a session on a remote host to leave a process running after I disconnect, or to pick the session back up on another PC. I do use tabs rather than repeatedly switching tmux sessions, but I do end up running tmux for splitting the GUI into side by side layouts. |
| |
| ▲ | pdimitar 5 hours ago | parent [-] | | Detaching is working just fine with `screen` as well. I like the idea of tmux but as another poster suggested, I prefer to just get better at my
window manager to achieve similar results. tmux requires way too many key presses for me. |
|
|
| ▲ | conception 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| SecureCRT is a paid program I’ve used for years and it’s just so comprehensive. It’s not cheap but the quality shows. |
|
| ▲ | leetrout 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Scroll back search is coming. You can try it in the nightly. |
| |
| ▲ | karmakaze 6 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Very glad for that--it's what made me stop my evaluation the first time around. I looked for the feature in issues and just saw #9821 about memory use of the buffer which could be an issue if configuring very large scrollback as I do. BTW is there feature parity between macOS and Linux, e.g. scrollback buffer searching on Linux? | |
| ▲ | pdimitar 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | I'll wait for the stable release and will retest it. Not in a rush and not the early adopter kind of guy. | | |
|
|
| ▲ | eikenberry 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| > Alacritty I like but the lack of tabs is not acceptable for the moment... and before you ask: I hate tmux. So much more key presses to achieve basic functionality, it boggles my mind why people love it. But, to each their own obviously. Tabs usually mean mouse+click to switch which takes way more effort that a simple alt+number or similar keybinding used to switch "tabs" in tmux. I'd guess that some terminal emulator tabs allow keybindings to switch tabs as well but, modelling OP, I'm focusing on the expected default experience. |
| |
| ▲ | pdimitar 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | No, zero mouse usage, you can both address each tab by number and just moving between them. I wouldn't have any terminal emulator without the latter feature at least, and all I've tried support it. I hate mixed mouse + keyboard workflows as well. |
|
|
| ▲ | goodpoint 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Kitty has poor security https://github.com/kovidgoyal/kitty/issues/2084 |
|
| ▲ | intothemild 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Personally kitty is the only one I keep coming back too. Mostly because it's very customisable, fast, lean, ligatures, separate font for italics, great macro support, and supports automatic tiling panes. |
|
| ▲ | dbdr 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| > Alacritty I like but the lack of tabs is not acceptable for the moment... and before you ask: I hate tmux. Another option is to leave the tabbing to your window manager. |
| |
| ▲ | pdimitar 5 hours ago | parent [-] | | Cool, but I'm 100% clueless as to how. Haven't migrated to Linux yet and this one of the next important items for me to learn. |
|
|
| ▲ | jen20 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| You can search scroll back on Ghostty nightly. I switched straight from iTerm2 (after 20 years of iTerm), but _do_ remember the reason I rejected Kitty: it has a ton of Python in it, which is usually indicative of software which is going to be a pain in the ass. |