| ▲ | LukeB42 8 hours ago |
| Beauty /is/ in the eye of the beholder. The rationale /here/ is that the more text in a page the more code you'll fit in your head the more you'll get done, the more confidence you'll have and again the more you'll achieve. |
|
| ▲ | DiabloD3 8 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| Zero code is in your head if you can't read it. The predominant monitor in existence is your average 24" 1080p monitor, sat at, on average, 32" away from the head. The average person has worse than 20/20 vision. You must test your website in such conditions and make sure it is readable, and also make sure it meets at minimum WCAG A, but preferably the whole way to AAA if possible. |
| |
| ▲ | LukeB42 8 hours ago | parent [-] | | Thank you but the predominant monitor's probably a smartphone. The average professional is probably using a 4k monitor at the moment. Everything in the free documentation I've provided you out of my own time and money that you're referring to exists in relation to the other elements in that page, so to get the experience you're after simply ctrl+scroll and change the CSS zoom level like the riot at parties that you could be or catch up with circa 2013-2014 and invest in a 4k display please. | | |
| ▲ | rschristian 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | "Zoom in" or "buy a different monitor" is not an appropriate response to people bringing up the plethora of objective & subjective a11y issues on the page. If you really don't care about providing an accessible experience, try this: no one will use the tool if they can't read the docs. With my monitor and eyesight, it's entirely illegible. | | |
| ▲ | LukeB42 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | Name one objective issue with what I've provided your ungrateful self for free and do it in HN's 12pt again because I need a laugh. |
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | turtlebits 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| OP has a valid point. On my Mac, it's unreadable without zooming in. I immediately left the page. |
| |
|
| ▲ | heroku 8 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| [dead] |