| ▲ | PunchyHamster 3 hours ago | |
I think there is distinction there between look and functionality. They were functionally just fine; good even compared to some modern abominations. But the look was just plain and ugly, even compared to some alternatives at the time. > Things started going downhill, in my opinion, with the Windows XP "Fisher-Price" Luna interface and the Microsoft Office 2007 ribbon. Yeah I just ran it with 2000-compatible look; still ugly but at least not wasting screen space | ||
| ▲ | layer8 3 hours ago | parent [-] | |
Windows 95 was a vast improvement in looks over 3.x. Of course tastes differ, but I found it very aesthetic, not ugly at all, and used the classic look until Windows 7 EOLd. | ||