the FSF position is that GPL is unenforceable without a single copyright owner, which is why almost all gnu projects, linux, canonical/redhat/etc projects have a CLA or something functionally similar

▲

Macha 4 hours ago | parent [-]

That would seem a bizarre position from the FSF, since it would make the license on combined GPL works unenforceable. Do you have a source for that?

	▲	nine_k 13 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		GPL maternally depends on copyright enforcement. Who would sue if an infringement is detected? All the contributors collectively?