Right, which is probably the point made by the negotiators on behalf of the US Government. "We don't want Anthropic's standard, we want the Constitution."

▲

notepad0x90 6 hours ago | parent [-]

Maybe I'm misunderstanding but are you taking the gov's side? Anthropic's standard was the constitutions. The executive branch has no authorization under US law to perform surveillance of any kind on its own. OpenAI will now be breaking US law, Anthropic simply decided to obey US law.

The US government can update its laws and come back to Anthropic, or do what they just did

▲

piker 5 hours ago | parent [-]

No, I'm not taking the government's side. I'm telling the government's side. That's probably true that the executive branch can't do those things, but it may be able to do so in the future. Thus, Anthropic's rule would then be inconsistent with the laws applying to the government.

> The US government can update its laws and come back to Anthropic

No, this I do take issue with. It's the people who update the U.S. government's laws.

	▲	notepad0x90 3 hours ago \| parent [-]
		the people via their elected reps.. the government. The government is of the people and by the people. They're not different if democracy is truly working. > but it may be able to do so in the future. You don't obey laws in the future, you obey laws today. Companies have an obligation to follow the laws as written today. Not only that, as americans they and all americans have a patriotic and civic duty to resist attempts to bypass or undermine the constitution of their country. You literally can't be patriotic or loyal to your country without doing so, it is what constitutes the country. It's not like Anthropic can't update their guardrails and contracts once the laws of the land are updated. They simply resisted a criminal and treasonous abuse of power.