| ▲ | specialist 4 hours ago | |
IANAL, IIRC: SCOTUS has very narrowly defined bribery as explicit quid pro quo. And sometimes not even then. | ||
| ▲ | RajT88 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |
You recall correctly. And they did so, so they could take bribes with no consequences as long as they take them the right way. | ||
| ▲ | roughly 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |
Trevor Noah pretty much nailed this in the first Trump admin: | ||