Based on the list of contributors to your project, I am not sure this starting location is optimally suited to the task of building a foundation for polished, reliable, expandable software.

▲

adampunk an hour ago | parent | next [-]

In that case I kindly refer you to the matter of Arkell v. Pressdam.

▲

adius 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

It's having ~ 5000 tests already. Used correctly, AI agents can help you improve the quality of the code!

▲

the__alchemist 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Do you see why this perspective is a red flag on its own?

▲

ComplexSystems 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I certainly don't. If a software developer has found a way to use these tools that works well for them and produces good results, that's a good thing.

▲

mountainriver 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

No I don’t, review your code

	▲	supriyo-biswas 3 hours ago \| parent [-]
		If I go by the contributor numbers on Github, I see Claude has committed something on the order of 300,000 lines of code. I don't think it's reasonable to review that much code, even in weeks worth of time.

▲

copperx 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

God help us.

▲

s3p 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

The sneering on HN really has no end. This is a good project! I for one am very excited to see an interpreter born out of rust.

	▲	mountainriver 3 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		It’s so obnoxious
	▲	Keyframe 2 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		It's a defense mechanism. I was guilty as charge as well initially. Suddenly most of your l33t skillz are trivialized and surpassed by an inhumane actor. It's a tough pill to swallow.