> I get that they rely on people not using all of their quota

They have no problem with users using their quota on their own software. Because they get the signals. They do have a problem with users using the API in 3rd party software, because they don't get the signals.

▲

falcor84 5 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Well ... the clear signal is that people want to use Google's models but not Google products

▲

theblazehen 4 hours ago | parent [-]

Most people have actually just been using Opus through antigravity

▲

falcor84 an hour ago | parent [-]

That's very different from what I'm seeing around me, but yes, I suppose that happens to. And I guess Google wouldn't have as much of an issue with that, right?

	▲	theblazehen an hour ago \| parent [-]
		Ah, in my spaces (Involved in the proxy dev), most people have been using it for Opus. I suspect they may even have more of an issue with it, as they don't get the cost advantage of serving an in-house model

▲

xiphias2 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

I don't really understand this reasoning actually:

if OpenClaw usage go up, and a service (OpenAI it looks like) gets lots of usage data for personal assistent usage, they can optimize to make it better for people who get a $200 subscription just because of that use case.