It’s all virtual virtue signaling. If you were to say this shit in the office, you’d be walked out pretty fast.

Zak 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Who is signaling what virtues to whom in this context?

When I see PG write something like that, it signals to me that he has embraced AI hype to the point that he is displaying poor taste and embracing a risky technical practice.

▲

wiseowise 3 hours ago | parent [-]

PG is signaling his AI bros, idk.

	▲	Zak a few seconds ago \| parent [-]
		I imagine PG is rich enough and influential enough in the tech/VC space that he doesn't have to signal anything he doesn't honestly believe. It's unsurprising he would believe LLM coding tools are a productivity boon, but using code quantity as a measure of software development progress is one of the most famously wrong ideas in the software world. Either he wrote carelessly, or he believes that LLM tools have changed that reality. I'm inclined to think LLM tools haven't substantially changed that reality. LLMs perform better when more of the problem fits in context, so succinctness remains valuable.

▲

andrei_says_ 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Maybe it depends on whose office? C-suite management who salivate after reducing software engineer headcount?