Don’t you think Grok / X.ai is worse?

mikkupikku 8 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Grok isn't even in the running. It's a "me too" embarrassment that only exists so the owner can feel as though he's a meaningful participant.

▲

Loughla 7 hours ago | parent [-]

And fake nudes. It definitely exists to make fake nudes of anyone at all. So there's at least something more than the King's ego at play with Grok.

If you're not sure, I believe that Grok is a vanity project by a very egomaniacal person.

▲

verdverm 6 hours ago | parent [-]

And also an attempt to make an alternative wikipedia without the human requirements, in an effort to manipulate information and public opinion at scale.

Just remember, the Epstein Class is very good, and happy to, play the long game. When the people in charge of government are different, they need to be as aggressive at undoing and punishing.

▲

edgyquant 6 hours ago | parent [-]

Wikipedia is quite guilty of exactly what you just said anyway.

	▲	verdverm 6 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Wikipedia is written by people, Grokapedo is Ai generated

▲

mentalgear 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

It is indeed, though personally I do not perceive Grok/xAi as one of the top LLM companies. Yes, they do some benchmark-maxing, but I do not think they are on par with Anthropic, Google/DeepMind or openAi.

	▲	stingraycharles 7 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Isn’t the question rather whether the DoD considers them a feasible supplier?

▲

jdiaz97 8 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Not a real AI company, every time Grok shows actual intelligence it gets lobotomized by Elon to glaze him