| ▲ | cjfd 5 hours ago | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The article talks about 'software development will be democratized' but the current LLM hype is quite the opposite. The LLMs are owned by large companies and are quite impossible to train by any individual, if only because of energy costs. The situation where I am typing my code on my linux machine is much more democratic. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | tkel 33 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Right, people misuse this term "democratized" all the time. Because it sounds nice. But it's incorrect. Democracy is about governance, not access. A "democratized" LLM would be one in which its users collectively made decisions about how it was managed. Or if the companies that owned LLMs were ran democratically. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | Havoc 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
It is democratising from the perspective of non-programmers- they can now make their own tools. What you say about big tech is true at same time though. I worry about what happens when China takes the lead and no longer feels the need to do open models. First hints already showing - advance access to ds4 only for Chinese hardware makers | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | xg15 36 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
It's "democratizing" in the same way Uber "democratized" taxis... | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||