| ▲ | b65e8bee43c2ed0 4 hours ago |
| [flagged] |
|
| ▲ | wslack 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| No other administration has used the "supply chain risk" designation against an American company. This is unprecedented. |
| |
| ▲ | jim33442 38 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | It's done worse in this area. Biden administration refused contracts with any company that didn't require all in-person employees to get the covid19 vaccine, so the firing extended down to the employees. The courts stopped this when boosters got added to the requirement. | |
| ▲ | b65e8bee43c2ed0 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | because it is a big fucking risk if the tool you rely on can refuse to function at a critical moment, and the vendor publicly brags about refusing to eliminate such refusals. ta-ta, see you in 3 years. |
|
|
| ▲ | mountainriver 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Why (the fuck) would a government of the people, believe they have the rights over free enterprise tools, to take them and use them for nefarious purposes |
| |
| ▲ | 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | [deleted] | |
| ▲ | typeofhuman 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Have you paid attention during any of the Administrations? In this post-Snowden era we have no excuse for not knowing the "government of the people" has been doing this to companies for a long time. AT&T for example. This Administration just does it out in the open. |
|
|
| ▲ | crummy 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Should humans tolerate contracts that say “you may not use this thing in this particular way” |
| |
| ▲ | pants2 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | That's exactly what the Terms of Service are that you agree to for every service you've ever paid for | |
| ▲ | techpression 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | We do, it’s called the law and applies to a lot of things. |
|