They can also classify it as restricted data -- like nuclear weapons technology.

Sure, there will be a court battle, but I don't think these companies want to take that chance. They'll capitulate after the lawyers realize that option is on the table.

▲

strix_varius 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

> They'll capitulate after the lawyers realize that option is on the table.

Hopefully their lawyers read HN comments so they can negotiate with your deeper understanding of the legal landscape.

▲

dragonwriter 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

> They can also classify it as restricted data -- like nuclear weapons technology.

Nuclear weapons technology is restricted under very specific legislative authority, where is the corresponding authority that could be selectively applied to a particular vendors AI models or services?

	▲	thinkthatover 4 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		agreed but the current administration is pretty adept at using the slimmest margin for justification and benefiting from the fact that the legal process playing out over years is extremely detrimental to everyone but the government
	▲	readitalready 4 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		EDA software, software to design computer chips in general, has been classified as ITAR now under this administration. Trump can do that to AI.