|
| ▲ | beej71 6 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| > If Anthropic doesn’t want the responsibilities of being a US company When did this suddenly become "businesses will do whatever the government says regardless of earlier contracts signed"? |
| |
| ▲ | mamami 6 hours ago | parent [-] | | Because when woke communism does it it's bad, but when we do it it's good |
|
|
| ▲ | TehCorwiz 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I see it more like: I sell you a pencil and I could not care less what you write with it. You ask me to write a note for you and I will exert editorial discretion. Because unless I’m missing something we’re talking about Anthropic’s infrastructure running LLMs. If it was a physical good I could see another interpretation. Further, what law lets the government dictate what contracts a company signs? Anthropic refused to work with them. We had a whole Supreme Court case about refusing working with customers. |
|
| ▲ | garbawarb 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Are they legally required to agree to a new contract? Which law says this? |
|
| ▲ | singleshot_ 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| > they’re legally required to in the US Obviously false, not even arguable |
|
| ▲ | corpoposter 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Facilitating "mass domestic surveillance" and "fully autonomous weapons" are social responsibilities now? Insanity. |
|
| ▲ | telchior 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| This makes an interesting assumption: that being told by any member of government that you're legally required to do something, means you're required to do that thing, and that they're definitely not making those things up as they go. But that's not the case, is it? The government can say that it's legally required to give Donald Trump a gold bar every Sunday. That wouldn't even be too far off from the outlandish claims we've seen over the past year. The Trump administration is, as Chapelle would put it, a habitual line stepper. |
|
| ▲ | behole 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Boot meet tongue |
|
| ▲ | hobs 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I like how you use the phrase social responsibilities to mean doing whatever the DoD wants which includes spying on the American people and operating autonomous drones to kill people. It's like saying they have social responsibilities to enable murder for people who have been shown to be unthinking murderers justifying the most pointless murders because they think it makes "their side" winners. |
| |
|
| ▲ | 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| [deleted] |
|
| ▲ | jibal 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| It's bad faith to call one's position in a dispute "obvious", and that's before we even get to all the insults. (What is obvious is the kind of response I will get, which is why I will ignore it and not comment further.) |
|
| ▲ | kalkin 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| > petite bourgeoisie clutching their pearls > mean girl slights |
|
| ▲ | mikeg8 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Lick! The! Boot! |