| ▲ | President Trump bans Anthropic from use in government systems(npr.org) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| 136 points by pkress2 7 hours ago | 20 comments | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | _alternator_ 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
This should come as no surprise. The administration has no tolerance for anyone with “values” or “scruples” that challenge their power. They fired Judge Advocate Generals (military lawyers) that refused to authorize strikes on civilian boats, for one recent example. If you say ‘no’ for any reason, they fire you. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | anon7000 4 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Why the fuck does the president have authority to set specific IT policy for the government. He might not even have it, he loves making policies he doesn’t actually have the authority to make. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | ViscountPenguin 15 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Good fucking on anthropic, I've long held that they seem like the AI company best handling existential risk, and this elevates that opinion. If you don't want terminator, not helping people invent terminator is a good first step. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | stopbulying an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
> [ Won't be my little defense b? Then you can't do government contracts at all! ] | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | taurath 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Now we will all see how much power the president has over the markets which clearly prefer Anthropics offering | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | LordGrey 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
If OpenAI and Google stay in sync with Anthropic on this, will Trump try to ban all of them from the federal government? What alternatives would they turn to? | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | ChrisArchitect 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | unethical_ban 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Imagine if a private company had developed the nuclear bomb, and said in its terms "This can never be used as a first strike weapon and must only be used as a retaliation against imminent existential attacks on the US homeland". I think a lot of people would have lauded the attempt by a weapon's creators to restrain the destructive potential of their creation. Separately: An opinion piece in the NYT suggested that Anthropic should not have restrictions and that "lawful use" provision should properly constrain the government. The fact that we have to hope Anthropic holds to their commitment is a show of no-confidence in the rule of law and the legislature of the United States to protect the people. Seriously. All they said was "don't do mass surveillance and don't create autonomous killbots" and the president literally frames it as "Anthropic vs. the Constitution" and calls them woke radicals. How any citizen doesn't immediately have their stomach churning is beyond me. Oh wait, out of [Fox, WSJ, NYT, WaPo, NPR, Newsmax] only Fox doesn't have an article up about it, and Newsmax left out the part about domestic mass surveillance. I am shocked! | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | faanghacker an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Shouldn't this be great news that the government is banned from using Anthropic? I don't know why suddenly the narrative here turns to spinning this as "Trump is evil" when this is actually keeping the AI company out of the government's reach. The level of cognitive dissonance here is unreal. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | deep_noz an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
pathetic | |||||||||||||||||||||||