>never read anything from ever again

I think it's a poisonous and reductive mindset to have. You can separate art from the character of the artist. If you cared about everything everyone has ever said or done in various stages of their lives, you wouldn't have much left to enjoy or appreciate.

▲

ses1984 an hour ago | parent | next [-]

On the other hand, there is so so much art out there, I could never hope to consume it all. It’s simple for me to use the character of the artist as a filter. I can break that rule whenever I want, but by default, other things being equal, I would prefer to consume art for pleasure from artists I respect as people.

I do consume art from outside this bubble but more to satisfy academic curiosity than pleasure.

▲

isr 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

He's referring ... to his "art". Thats what the piece he linked to was a part of.

Its not poisonous nor reductive to decide not to follow an "artist" because his "art" is repulsive.

▲

ZpJuUuNaQ5 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

"I will never read anything by [AUTHOR] because some things [AUTHOR] wrote are now in my no no list."

Sorry, that just doesn't make sense to me.

	▲	weavejester 11 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		With the amount of fiction available to read, why give your money to authors who are bad people?

▲

lxgr an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

Sure, but at the same time it's debatable whether even an artist themselves gets to retroactively reinterpret their own art that way.