How wouldn't this also apply to things like useradd(8) or simply automated user account setup, e.g. like cups, sshd, etc? Do we need to add this to vi for use in vipw on UNIX?

▲

hedora 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Worse. Google has to add this to all the machines in their data centers? Imagine the expansion of DevOps BS this will enable:

Vendors will need support stuff like "account holder is 12msec old, and can access adult content". They can even create a special certification for it.

	▲	Muromec 3 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		So... That was the new market that all the ai-layoffs have freed the much needed labor for
	▲	p0w3n3d 2 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		Imagine unattended installations... Which stop to ask you for the age

▲

beej71 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

All good questions the legislators had no idea even existed.

	▲	ewzimm 6 hours ago \| parent [-]
		useradd has the Other category at setup. Could you argue that anything which allows arbitrary text information to be input into a user account that could be passed on to other applications technically fulfills the requirement, as the user could indicate age on the account?

▲

singron 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

"User" in the bill actually means child, so cups etc. don't apply.

▲

boznz 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

..or "browse as guest" on a chromebook?