| ▲ | hinkley 5 hours ago | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
I did a microbenchmark recently and found that on node 24, awaiting a sync function is about 90 times slower than just calling it. If the function is trivial, which can often be the case. If you go back a few versions, that number goes up to around 105x. I don’t recall now if I tested back to 14. There was an optimization to async handling in 16 that I recall breaking a few tests that depended on nextTick() behavior that stopped happening, such that the setup and execution steps started firing in the wrong order, due to a mock returning a number instead of a Promise. I wonder if I still have that code somewhere… | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | rrr_oh_man 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
> I did a microbenchmark recently and found that on node 24, awaiting a sync function is about 90 times slower than just calling it. If the function is trivial, which can often be the case. I dabble in JS and… what?! Any idea why? | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | conartist6 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Here is my test harness and results: https://github.com/conartist6/async-perf | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||